IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/veecee/v23y2021i2p111-127.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The role of corporate venture capital on returns to acquiring firms: evidence from the biotechnology industry

Author

Listed:
  • Jay J Janney
  • Naga Lakshmi Damaraju
  • Gregory G. Dess

Abstract

Corporate venture capital (CVC) firms face considerable uncertainty while investing time, capital, and other resources in their portfolio firms, typically entrepreneurial ventures. The absence of unambiguous measures of performance about the portfolio firm’s prospects for success and longevity typically is at the root of such uncertainty. Prior research, based on the literature on inter-organizational endorsements grounded in the institutional theory, focused on returns to the portfolio firms under such conditions of uncertainty. We, on the other hand, test the hypotheses that the “prominence” of a CVC firm and the presence of a “prior investment” in the portfolio firm serve as endorsements and the acquiring firms, as endorsers, earn positive financial returns. Results from a sample of biotechnology acquisitions, using an event study methodology for capturing the cumulative abnormal returns (CARs) to acquisition announcements and ordinary least squares regressions (OLS) to study the determinants of the CARs, support the hypotheses.

Suggested Citation

  • Jay J Janney & Naga Lakshmi Damaraju & Gregory G. Dess, 2021. "The role of corporate venture capital on returns to acquiring firms: evidence from the biotechnology industry," Venture Capital, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2), pages 111-127, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:veecee:v:23:y:2021:i:2:p:111-127
    DOI: 10.1080/13691066.2021.1882722
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13691066.2021.1882722
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13691066.2021.1882722?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:veecee:v:23:y:2021:i:2:p:111-127. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TVEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.