IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uterxx/v48y2025i10p1127-1164.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effects of Social Media, Elites, and Political Polarization on Civil Conflict

Author

Listed:
  • Lance Y. Hunter
  • Glen Biglaiser

Abstract

Although prior research has investigated how social, economic, and political factors affect civil conflict, empirical scholarship has yet to consider how social media impacts civil conflict. Using cross-national research for up to 157 states from 2000–2019, this study examines the effect social media has on civil conflict. We find that more time spent on social media, greater social media penetration (i.e. the number of users), and the specific manner elites use social media are associated with an increased number and severity of civil conflicts. We also carry out mediation analysis and see that elite use of social media to organize offline political activities, government elites’ dissemination of false information, and political party elites’ dissemination of disinformation are all correlated with an increase in political polarization, and polarization raises the likelihood of civil conflict. Our results indicate the ways social media affects political violence, showing how different communication technologies can serve to exacerbate civil conflict under certain conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Lance Y. Hunter & Glen Biglaiser, 2025. "The Effects of Social Media, Elites, and Political Polarization on Civil Conflict," Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(10), pages 1127-1164, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:uterxx:v:48:y:2025:i:10:p:1127-1164
    DOI: 10.1080/1057610X.2022.2163461
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1057610X.2022.2163461
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1057610X.2022.2163461?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uterxx:v:48:y:2025:i:10:p:1127-1164. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uter20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.