IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uterxx/v45y2022i11p953-976.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Duped: Examining Gender Stereotypes in Disengagement and Deradicalization Practices

Author

Listed:
  • Rachel Schmidt

Abstract

In narratives around insurgencies, terrorism, and other forms of political violence, the media—and policymakers—frequently portray women as victims or unintelligent pawns of men. But these violent women get more media attention than their male counterparts because they are a shocking departure from gendered expectations of nurturing, peaceful women. However, even such narratives of deviance can reinforce societal stereotypes about women by emphasizing that they are emotional but not political, easily manipulated, often deranged, or simply unintelligent. Using in-depth interviews in Ireland and the United Kingdom with practitioners in counter terrorism (CT) and countering violent extremism (CVE), this paper argues that a failure to ask meaningful questions about women’s roles in extremist violence has reinforced gender stereotypes, leading to disengagement and deradicalization practices that ignore or downplay women’s importance in fostering violence.

Suggested Citation

  • Rachel Schmidt, 2022. "Duped: Examining Gender Stereotypes in Disengagement and Deradicalization Practices," Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(11), pages 953-976, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:uterxx:v:45:y:2022:i:11:p:953-976
    DOI: 10.1080/1057610X.2020.1711586
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1057610X.2020.1711586
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1057610X.2020.1711586?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uterxx:v:45:y:2022:i:11:p:953-976. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uter20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.