IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uteexx/v70y2025i3p73-100.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic evaluation on cross-border bridge project using Monte Carlo simulation: A China–Russia project case study

Author

Listed:
  • Hongyi Lv
  • Zhenwu Shi
  • Jie Liu

Abstract

Cross-border bridge projects play a crucial role in enhancing economic integration and regional connectivity. However, traditional economic evaluation methods often fail to capture the uncertainties associated with such large-scale infrastructure investments. This study employs Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) to assess the economic feasibility and risks of the China–Russia Heihe Bridge project. By incorporating probabilistic analysis into financial assessment, we estimate key indicators, including Net Present Value (NPV), Internal Rate of Return (IRR), and Dynamic Payback Period (DPP) under varying economic conditions. The results indicate a positive economic outlook, with an expected NPV of 19.44 billion Russian rubles and an IRR of 12.05%, surpassing the benchmark rate of 8%. Sensitivity analysis confirms the project’s financial resilience, maintaining feasibility even under adverse scenarios of increased costs and reduced benefits. The findings highlight the effectiveness of Monte Carlo Simulation in improving the accuracy of infrastructure investment evaluations. This study provides valuable insights for policymakers and investors in assessing cross-border infrastructure projects under uncertainty.

Suggested Citation

  • Hongyi Lv & Zhenwu Shi & Jie Liu, 2025. "Economic evaluation on cross-border bridge project using Monte Carlo simulation: A China–Russia project case study," The Engineering Economist, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 70(3), pages 73-100, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:uteexx:v:70:y:2025:i:3:p:73-100
    DOI: 10.1080/0013791X.2025.2515824
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0013791X.2025.2515824
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0013791X.2025.2515824?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uteexx:v:70:y:2025:i:3:p:73-100. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UTEE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.