IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uteexx/v70y2025i1-2p57-71.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fast and stable portfolios through Huber’s criterion for constrained index tracking

Author

Listed:
  • Ning Li
  • Guanghui Zhu
  • Yong Niu
  • Meilan Sun

Abstract

A portfolio with numerous small and illiquid positions typically leads to high transaction costs and the need for frequent rebalancing. To address this issue, one could opt for a sparse portfolio strategy that can effectively track the benchmark index while simplifying portfolio management and reducing transaction costs. However, this approach requires prior specification of the maximum number of assets that can be selected. The computational complexity of cardinality-constrained optimization, particularly in high-dimensional settings, makes the regularization method a more preferable choice to handle such constraints. In this article, we introduce a more efficient index tracking method using penalized Huber loss regression, which automatically selects assets and allocates capital under a set of general convex constraints. Furthermore, we derive a fast algorithm based on coordinate descent to solve the resulting optimization problem. We also empirically evaluate the proposed methodology on real-world data sets. Promising results demonstrate the superiority of the proposed method in terms of tracking error and running time.

Suggested Citation

  • Ning Li & Guanghui Zhu & Yong Niu & Meilan Sun, 2025. "Fast and stable portfolios through Huber’s criterion for constrained index tracking," The Engineering Economist, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 70(1-2), pages 57-71, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:uteexx:v:70:y:2025:i:1-2:p:57-71
    DOI: 10.1080/0013791X.2025.2489362
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0013791X.2025.2489362
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0013791X.2025.2489362?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uteexx:v:70:y:2025:i:1-2:p:57-71. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UTEE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.