IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uteexx/v68y2023i1p2-19.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An integrated approach to evaluating inland waterway disruptions using economic interdependence, agent-based, and Bayesian models

Author

Listed:
  • Paul M. Johnson
  • Hiba Baroud
  • Craig Philip
  • Mark Abkowitz

Abstract

The U.S. inland waterways play a vital role in the domestic economy, but extreme weather events, especially floods, perennially threaten to disrupt their operations. Here, we develop a data-driven approach to analyzing economic risks due to flood closures along the inland waterways that combines agent-based, economic interdependence, and Bayesian modeling. We demonstrate our framework by evaluating economic impacts of various flood disruptions along the Upper Mississippi River and determining cases where a publicly operated, flood-resilient port located near the mouth of the river can reroute shipments and mitigate production losses for the region. We find that Illinois, Louisiana, Minnesota, and Missouri are the states that suffer the most production losses from flood disruptions and that agriculture and chemical manufacturing are the most impacted industries. However, during floods whose return periods exceed 30-years, the flood resilient port becomes cost-effective in mitigating losses for the region. Our methodology can be easily extended to other hazards and sections of the inland waterways.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul M. Johnson & Hiba Baroud & Craig Philip & Mark Abkowitz, 2023. "An integrated approach to evaluating inland waterway disruptions using economic interdependence, agent-based, and Bayesian models," The Engineering Economist, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 68(1), pages 2-19, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:uteexx:v:68:y:2023:i:1:p:2-19
    DOI: 10.1080/0013791X.2022.2139029
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0013791X.2022.2139029
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0013791X.2022.2139029?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uteexx:v:68:y:2023:i:1:p:2-19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UTEE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.