IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uteexx/v67y2022i1p75-93.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Case study of an equivalent annual cost model for economic lifetime for construction vehicles under cost uncertainty

Author

Listed:
  • Mohamad Zarean
  • Ahmad Reza Sayadi
  • Amin Alah Mousavi

Abstract

Whereas the practical importance of the Economic Lifetime (EL) is well-known, selecting the proper process has always been a dilemma. In this respect, classical methods dating back to one century ago are generally favored, but using them in a data-driven approach still has particular shortcomings. This paper aims to present a Life Cycle Cost (LCC) model determining the EL of a truck while fluctuation in historical data deepens through its lifespan. The equivalent annual cost of LCC is developed based on Operating and Maintenance (O&M) costs along with the resale value. The O&M cost was estimated deterministically and stochastically using regression analysis and Brownian-Motion-based simulation. The resale value was modeled by employing a genetic algorithm. The model capability was evaluated using real data of a seven cubic-meters truck hauling rock-fill materials in a dam construction project. The optimal EL was estimated on average 105 months in deterministic condition, while it was 88-145 months at the 70% confidence level using non-deterministic approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohamad Zarean & Ahmad Reza Sayadi & Amin Alah Mousavi, 2022. "Case study of an equivalent annual cost model for economic lifetime for construction vehicles under cost uncertainty," The Engineering Economist, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 67(1), pages 75-93, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:uteexx:v:67:y:2022:i:1:p:75-93
    DOI: 10.1080/0013791X.2022.2028048
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0013791X.2022.2028048
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0013791X.2022.2028048?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uteexx:v:67:y:2022:i:1:p:75-93. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UTEE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.