IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uteexx/v66y2021i3p206-224.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic feasibility of the investment in residential photovoltaics system considering the effects of subsidy policies: A Korean case

Author

Listed:
  • Jingu Jang
  • Moonkyu Seo
  • Giwon Nam
  • Deok-Joo Lee

Abstract

The economic feasibility of the investment is critical for residential users’ decision making in investing in photovoltaic (PV) systems because the high costs of installing PV technology may be burdensome. Therefore, governments in many countries have been implementing policies to reduce the economic burden of household users' PV investments and thus promote solar energy to household users. The purpose of this paper is to perform an economic feasibility analysis of investments in residential PV systems that considers the effects of several subsidy plan alternatives using the empirical data of Korea. The result shows that the residential PV investment project would be economically viable without subsidy; however, a payback period exceeds 8 years, which could be perceived by residential customers as too long to be attractive enough to invest in a PV system at present. In addition, we found that the net present value is highest under the production based subsidy scheme, whereas the payback period is shortest with a lump-sum subsidy.

Suggested Citation

  • Jingu Jang & Moonkyu Seo & Giwon Nam & Deok-Joo Lee, 2021. "Economic feasibility of the investment in residential photovoltaics system considering the effects of subsidy policies: A Korean case," The Engineering Economist, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 66(3), pages 206-224, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:uteexx:v:66:y:2021:i:3:p:206-224
    DOI: 10.1080/0013791X.2020.1831119
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0013791X.2020.1831119
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0013791X.2020.1831119?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uteexx:v:66:y:2021:i:3:p:206-224. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UTEE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.