IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uteexx/v65y2020i4p321-338.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal capital structure of government-subsidized private participation in infrastructure projects

Author

Listed:
  • Borliang Chen

Abstract

A government-subsidized private participation in infrastructure (PPI) project is a solution to attract private investors to invest in financially non-viable infrastructure projects with high social benefits. A government-subsidized PPI project comprises three financing sources: government subsidy, equity, and debt. For government-subsidized PPI projects, the government subsidy level must be determined before the optimal debt ratio can be determined. A government subsidy level that is too low may lead to the project being non-bankable for financial institutes and a level that is too high may result in high excess returns for project investors. This paper develops cooperative game models, which are multiple–variable game models, to determine optimal solutions for four major decision variables – the government subsidy, tariff, debt ratio, and interest rate for project negotiation for PPI projects. This three–party game model is developed to identify terms and conditions that optimize the total benefits of financially non-viable PPI projects, which can lead to successful PPI project negotiations. The Kaohsiung cable car project in Taiwan is used for demonstration purposes. The results of the analysis show that optimal solutions for the three financing sources - government subsidy, equity, and debt - can be determined by the models.

Suggested Citation

  • Borliang Chen, 2020. "Optimal capital structure of government-subsidized private participation in infrastructure projects," The Engineering Economist, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 65(4), pages 321-338, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:uteexx:v:65:y:2020:i:4:p:321-338
    DOI: 10.1080/0013791X.2019.1707923
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0013791X.2019.1707923
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0013791X.2019.1707923?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uteexx:v:65:y:2020:i:4:p:321-338. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UTEE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.