IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uteexx/v62y2017i4p322-335.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adjustments within discount rates to cater for uncertainty—Guidelines

Author

Listed:
  • David G. Carmichael

Abstract

Deterministic discounted cash flow (DCF) analysis is a well-accepted technique in engineering appraisals. Common practice is to incorporate all uncertainty influences within a single variable—namely, the discount rate—which also represents the time value of money. Commentary already exists in the literature that such a practice is expedient but not rational and has shortcomings. This article examines the error involved in this practice and provides guidelines and precautions for using blanket or constant discount rates in dealing with uncertainties. It shows the adjustments necessary for any given investment scenario. This is done through establishing equivalence of the expected utility of deterministic and probabilistic present worth, allowing a rate adjustment to be calculated. Numerical studies look at the relationship or trends of this rate adjustment to the key analysis variables. Generally, it is found that the rate adjustment should be decreased as the timing of a cash flow's occurrence increases, increased as the variance of the cash flow increases, kept almost as an additive constant as the base rate increases, and increased as the investor's level of risk aversion increases. The article provides practitioner-friendly usable guidelines for adjusting rates, something that is unavailable elsewhere in the literature.

Suggested Citation

  • David G. Carmichael, 2017. "Adjustments within discount rates to cater for uncertainty—Guidelines," The Engineering Economist, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 62(4), pages 322-335, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:uteexx:v:62:y:2017:i:4:p:322-335
    DOI: 10.1080/0013791X.2016.1245376
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0013791X.2016.1245376
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0013791X.2016.1245376?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uteexx:v:62:y:2017:i:4:p:322-335. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UTEE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.