IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uteexx/v62y2017i3p254-271.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pricing catastrophe equity put options: Financial implications of engineering decisions

Author

Listed:
  • Zafer Aslan
  • Ivan Damnjanovic
  • John B. Mander

Abstract

Natural disasters such as earthquakes, floods, and tsunamis cause large-scale loss of life and result in billions of dollars in damages. However, the global insurance and reinsurance sector only bears a portion of this cost; the majority of the bill is still inflicted on corporations, local communities, and the governments that struggle to recover even years following the disaster. One of the key factors why insurance and reinsurance sectors do not play a more active role is the difficulty in absorbing the losses as well as accurately pricing the underlying risks. This article presents a valuation model for catastrophe equity puts (CatEPuts), an alternative method of risk transfer. The proposed valuation model is based on a four-step engineering loss model to compute the fair value of the CatEPut for different hazard intensities and structural responses. The results from test examples show that such a model can provide a necessary link between the engineering characteristics of the underlying physical assets and the fair value of the CatEPut.

Suggested Citation

  • Zafer Aslan & Ivan Damnjanovic & John B. Mander, 2017. "Pricing catastrophe equity put options: Financial implications of engineering decisions," The Engineering Economist, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 62(3), pages 254-271, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:uteexx:v:62:y:2017:i:3:p:254-271
    DOI: 10.1080/0013791X.2016.1186256
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0013791X.2016.1186256
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0013791X.2016.1186256?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uteexx:v:62:y:2017:i:3:p:254-271. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UTEE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.