IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uteexx/v59y2014i1p55-78.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Empirical Tests of Stochastic Dominance in Capital Investment Planning: A Spreadsheet Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Emmanuel A. Donkor

Abstract

The empirical inadequacy of direct application of stochastic dominance rules and their variants has led to the development of statistical tests for making dominance inferences. Yet very little is known about their application in capital investment planning, and the algorithms for their implementation are not readily available to the analyst who uses spreadsheets for capital investment planning. Therefore, this article develops a spreadsheet framework for conducting empirical tests of stochastic dominance when comparing alternative capital investment plans under uncertainty. It uses bootstrap and simulation methodology to compute the p-values required for making first- and second-order dominance inferences. Results from numerical examples show that empirical tests yield robust inferences when the structure of risk profiles and their integrals is such that dominance inferences by visual inspection are difficult. Therefore, analysts should model and empirically test for these relationships if they want to make defensible decisions when comparing risky capital investments.

Suggested Citation

  • Emmanuel A. Donkor, 2014. "Empirical Tests of Stochastic Dominance in Capital Investment Planning: A Spreadsheet Framework," The Engineering Economist, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(1), pages 55-78, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:uteexx:v:59:y:2014:i:1:p:55-78
    DOI: 10.1080/0013791X.2013.859336
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0013791X.2013.859336
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0013791X.2013.859336?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uteexx:v:59:y:2014:i:1:p:55-78. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UTEE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.