IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uteexx/v56y2011i4p354-384.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Case Study: Transport Carrier Replacement Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Kati Brunson
  • Betsy DeLee
  • Joshua Nachtigal
  • Bradley Hill
  • Joseph Hartman

Abstract

Four replacement scenarios were analyzed for a vehicle fleet designed to haul sensitive packages at two different customer locations. In addition to completing an economic replacement analysis study, each option was analyzed according to availability requirements and other intangible attributes. Finally, a thorough sensitivity analysis was performed to examine the impact of reliability assumptions on both life cycle costs and the expected economic life of each option. Once all factors were analyzed, each critical input was graded and scored, leading to the final recommendation to replace the current equipment with a new technology.

Suggested Citation

  • Kati Brunson & Betsy DeLee & Joshua Nachtigal & Bradley Hill & Joseph Hartman, 2011. "Case Study: Transport Carrier Replacement Analysis," The Engineering Economist, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(4), pages 354-384.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:uteexx:v:56:y:2011:i:4:p:354-384
    DOI: 10.1080/0013791X.2011.624921
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0013791X.2011.624921
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0013791X.2011.624921?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uteexx:v:56:y:2011:i:4:p:354-384. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UTEE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.