IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/usppxx/v6y2019i1p98-106.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost-Benefit Analysis of Discretionary Wars

Author

Listed:
  • Diane Hu
  • Andrew Cooper
  • Neel Desai
  • Sophie Guo
  • Steven Shi
  • David Banks

Abstract

Policy-makers should perform a cost-benefit analysis before initiating a war. This article describes a methodology for such assessment, and applies it post hoc to five military actions undertaken by the United States between 1950 and 2000 (the Korean War, the Vietnam War, the invasion of Grenada, the invasion of Panama, and the First Gulf War). The analysis identifies three broad categories of value: human capital, economic outcomes, and national influence. Different stakeholders (politicians, generals, industry, etc.) may assign different weights to these three categories, so this analysis tabulates each separately, and then, as may sometimes be necessary, monetizes them for unified comparison.

Suggested Citation

  • Diane Hu & Andrew Cooper & Neel Desai & Sophie Guo & Steven Shi & David Banks, 2019. "Cost-Benefit Analysis of Discretionary Wars," Statistics and Public Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 98-106, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:usppxx:v:6:y:2019:i:1:p:98-106
    DOI: 10.1080/2330443X.2019.1688740
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/2330443X.2019.1688740
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/2330443X.2019.1688740?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:usppxx:v:6:y:2019:i:1:p:98-106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uspp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.