IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/urecxx/v5y2024i1p48-72.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What makes gentrification ‘white’? Theorizing the mutual construction of whiteness and gentrification in the urban U.S

Author

Listed:
  • AJ Golio

Abstract

Urban gentrification is often assumed to be a racialized process. Scholarly work on gentrification, however, has generally left race underexplored, and has specifically not fully engaged with critical theories of whiteness, despite the frequent use of this categorization in a descriptive manner. In this review piece, I clarify this relationship by theorizing the mutual construction of whiteness and gentrification in contemporary U.S. cities. Whiteness, as a powerful structural and ideological force, shapes how gentrification processes play out via both appropriative practices of racialized cultural consumption and economic processes related to racial capitalism and racialized organizations. In turn, gentrification shapes whiteness by spurring salient discourse of racial difference and further necessitating the justification of racial economic inequality. When we imply that gentrification is “white,” what we mean is that it solidifies white structural dominance and reifies whiteness itself as a privileged racial categorization.

Suggested Citation

  • AJ Golio, 2024. "What makes gentrification ‘white’? Theorizing the mutual construction of whiteness and gentrification in the urban U.S," Journal of Race, Ethnicity and the City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(1), pages 48-72, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:urecxx:v:5:y:2024:i:1:p:48-72
    DOI: 10.1080/26884674.2023.2234275
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/26884674.2023.2234275
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/26884674.2023.2234275?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:urecxx:v:5:y:2024:i:1:p:48-72. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/urec .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.