IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uipsxx/v7y2011i3p3-22.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Individual Trust and Consumer Risk Perception

Author

Listed:
  • Byung Cho Kim
  • Lara Khansa
  • Tabitha James

Abstract

This paper examines the relationship between trust and risk perceptions of online activities. Specifically, we study the impact of an individual’s trust of other people on the severity and certainty of risk, which in turn influence an individual’s risk perception. We administer a 23-item survey to 386 participants at a large southeastern university, and test our model using structural equation modeling. We find evidence that supports the proposed relationship, implying that perceived certainty of risk is negatively associated with trust of individuals and that both certainty and severity of risk have a positive impact on an individual’s risk perception. Our results indicate that users may underestimate risks when they interact with people they trust, suggesting the need for a higher level of protection for transactions between individuals who are familiar with each other. From a modeling perspective, our straightforward model of trust and risk could be used in future studies that examine specific online activities.

Suggested Citation

  • Byung Cho Kim & Lara Khansa & Tabitha James, 2011. "Individual Trust and Consumer Risk Perception," Journal of Information Privacy and Security, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(3), pages 3-22, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:uipsxx:v:7:y:2011:i:3:p:3-22
    DOI: 10.1080/15536548.2011.10855915
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/15536548.2011.10855915
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/15536548.2011.10855915?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uipsxx:v:7:y:2011:i:3:p:3-22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uips .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.