IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uipsxx/v13y2017i2p69-83.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effect of Procedural and Technological Security Countermeasures on the Propensity to Misuse Medical Data

Author

Listed:
  • Wachiraporn Arunothong
  • Derek L. Nazareth

Abstract

As healthcare providers seek to comply with HIPAA and endeavor to secure their data from external breaches, they also need to realize that another threat to misuse of this data is inappropriate internal use by employees. Not all instances of misuse constitute a HIPAA violation, but they have the potential to become one. Medical data misuse by employees can be alleviated and curbed through the appropriate use of procedural and technological countermeasures. This paper seeks to determine whether electronic health records (EHR) policy and auditing procedures play a role in the propensity of providers to misuse medical data. Through an on-line survey of US physicians, nurses, medical students, and nursing students, using four case vignettes representing various forms of misuse, this research found that providers who were more aware of institutional security policy were more likely to adhere to policies than their counterparts who were not similarly informed. Likewise, providers who believed that their organizations monitored their EHR usage were less likely to engage in misuse than their counterparts who believed they were not monitored. The findings underscore the need for healthcare organizations to emphasize the importance of HIPAA compliance, and inform employees about the steps that the institution takes to maintain compliance, both from a procedural as well as technological standpoint. This study suggests that increasing the awareness of security and policy measures among employees is a vital part of preventing misuse.

Suggested Citation

  • Wachiraporn Arunothong & Derek L. Nazareth, 2017. "The Effect of Procedural and Technological Security Countermeasures on the Propensity to Misuse Medical Data," Journal of Information Privacy and Security, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 69-83, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:uipsxx:v:13:y:2017:i:2:p:69-83
    DOI: 10.1080/15536548.2017.1322421
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/15536548.2017.1322421
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/15536548.2017.1322421?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uipsxx:v:13:y:2017:i:2:p:69-83. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uips .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.