IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uipsxx/v11y2015i4p211-227.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Application of Keystroke Analysis for Physical Security: A Field Experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Christopher S. Leberknight
  • Michael L. Recce

Abstract

A major factor restricting the widespread acceptance of biometric security technologies is the lack of experimental results from repeated use in a real world setting. Specifically, with respect to keystroke analysis, previous research has primarily discussed the classification performance of the biometric by controlling different variables during laboratory experiments. This research is an extension of previous work that investigates the classification performance of keystroke analysis using a biometric keypad and several novel typing features during a 5-week field experiment. The ultimate goal is to explore stabilization patterns over time and to test if field study results support the optimal parameters and classification rates identified in the laboratory study. Results from the experiment demonstrate that a classification rate of 87% can be achieved during actual use of the biometric keypad by employing the optimal parameters. This finding helps to validate and extend previous work conducted in a laboratory setting. It also provides useful insight into experimental designs and support for the application of keystroke analysis in a real world environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Christopher S. Leberknight & Michael L. Recce, 2015. "The Application of Keystroke Analysis for Physical Security: A Field Experiment," Journal of Information Privacy and Security, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(4), pages 211-227, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:uipsxx:v:11:y:2015:i:4:p:211-227
    DOI: 10.1080/15536548.2015.1105599
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/15536548.2015.1105599
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/15536548.2015.1105599?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uipsxx:v:11:y:2015:i:4:p:211-227. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uips .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.