IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uipsxx/v10y2014i3p113-137.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social Network Privacy: Trusting Friends

Author

Listed:
  • Gerald V. Post
  • Suzanne B. Walchli

Abstract

Early social networks were generally open with minimal privacy controls. Some anecdotal evidence suggests that people might want more control over privacy on social networks. As an example of one response to this desire, the network Google+ was introduced as a major change by offering circles or groups to make it easier for users to share specific items with selected individuals. Building on earlier research that focuses primarily on trust in the web provider, this research model uses a social network as a function of privacy concerns and trust in contacts and tests the model using several groups of people. The model examines a personal need or desire for privacy, trust in friends, and attitudes towards social networks, and evaluates the impact of these variables on the usage of social networks. The results show that the demand for privacy and trust in friends does have direct impacts on the attitudes towards social networks. In addition, this network attitude in turn affects the rate of an individual’s usage of the networks. The results are applicable to any organization that includes social interactions on its site.

Suggested Citation

  • Gerald V. Post & Suzanne B. Walchli, 2014. "Social Network Privacy: Trusting Friends," Journal of Information Privacy and Security, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 113-137, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:uipsxx:v:10:y:2014:i:3:p:113-137
    DOI: 10.1080/15536548.2014.952596
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/15536548.2014.952596
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/15536548.2014.952596?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uipsxx:v:10:y:2014:i:3:p:113-137. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uips .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.