IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uiiexx/v54y2022i3p211-226.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

NP-ODE: Neural process aided ordinary differential equations for uncertainty quantification of finite element analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Yinan Wang
  • Kaiwen Wang
  • Wenjun Cai
  • Xiaowei Yue

Abstract

Finite Element Analysis (FEA) has been widely used to generate simulations of complex nonlinear systems. Despite its strength and accuracy, FEA usually has two limitations: (i) running high-fidelity FEA often requires high computational cost and consumes a large amount of time; (ii) FEA is a deterministic method that is insufficient for uncertainty quantification when modeling complex systems with various types of uncertainties. In this article, a physics-informed data-driven surrogate model, named Neural Process Aided Ordinary Differential Equation (NP-ODE), is proposed to model the FEA simulations and capture both input and output uncertainties. To validate the advantages of the proposed NP-ODE, we conduct experiments on both the simulation data generated from a given ordinary differential equation and the data collected from a real FEA platform for tribocorrosion. The results show that the proposed NP-ODE outperforms benchmark methods. The NP-ODE method realizes the smallest predictive error as well as generating the most reasonable confidence intervals with the best coverage on testing data points. Appendices, code, and data are available in the supplementary files.

Suggested Citation

  • Yinan Wang & Kaiwen Wang & Wenjun Cai & Xiaowei Yue, 2022. "NP-ODE: Neural process aided ordinary differential equations for uncertainty quantification of finite element analysis," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(3), pages 211-226, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:uiiexx:v:54:y:2022:i:3:p:211-226
    DOI: 10.1080/24725854.2021.1891485
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/24725854.2021.1891485
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/24725854.2021.1891485?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uiiexx:v:54:y:2022:i:3:p:211-226. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uiie .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.