IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uiiexx/v53y2021i5p552-567.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Toolpath planning for multi-gantry additive manufacturing

Author

Listed:
  • Hieu Bui
  • Harry A. Pierson
  • Sarah Nurre Pinkley
  • Kelly M. Sullivan

Abstract

Additive Manufacturing (AM), specifically Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) is revolutionizing the production of many products. FFF is one of the most popular AM processes because it is inexpensive, requires little maintenance, and has high material utilization. Unfortunately, long cycle times are a significant drawback that prevents FFF from being more widely implemented, especially for large-scale components. In response to this, printers that employ multiple independent FFF printheads simultaneously working on the same part have been developed, and multi-gantry configurations are now commercially available; however, there is a dearth of formal research on multi-gantry path planning, and current practices do not maximize printhead utilization or as-built mechanical properties. This article proposes a novel methodology for generating collision-free toolpaths for multi-gantry printers that yields shorter print times and superior mechanical properties compared with the state of the art. In this, a metaheuristic approach is used to seek near-optimal segmentation and scheduling of each layer while a collision checking and resolution algorithm enforces kinematic constraints to ensure collision-free solutions. Simulation is used to show the resulting makespan reduction for various layers, and the proposed methodology is physically implemented and verified. Tensile testing on samples printed via the current and proposed methods confirm that the proposed methodology results in superior mechanical properties.

Suggested Citation

  • Hieu Bui & Harry A. Pierson & Sarah Nurre Pinkley & Kelly M. Sullivan, 2021. "Toolpath planning for multi-gantry additive manufacturing," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(5), pages 552-567, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:uiiexx:v:53:y:2021:i:5:p:552-567
    DOI: 10.1080/24725854.2020.1775915
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/24725854.2020.1775915
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/24725854.2020.1775915?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uiiexx:v:53:y:2021:i:5:p:552-567. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uiie .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.