IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uiiexx/v53y2020i3p313-325.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multivariate regression of mixed responses for evaluation of visualization designs

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoning Kang
  • Xiaoyu Chen
  • Ran Jin
  • Hao Wu
  • Xinwei Deng

Abstract

Information visualization significantly enhances human perception by graphically representing complex data sets. The variety of visualization designs makes it challenging to efficiently evaluate all possible designs catering to users’ preferences and characteristics. Most existing evaluation methods perform user studies to obtain multivariate qualitative responses from users via questionnaires and interviews. However, these methods cannot support online evaluation of designs, as they are often time-consuming. A statistical model is desired to predict users’ preferences on visualization designs based on non-interference measurements (i.e., wearable sensor signals). In this work, we propose a Multivariate Regression of Mixed Responses (MRMR) to facilitate quantitative evaluation of visualization designs. The proposed MRMR method is able to provide accurate model prediction with meaningful variable selection. A simulation study and a user study of evaluating visualization designs with 14 effective participants are conducted to illustrate the merits of the proposed model.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoning Kang & Xiaoyu Chen & Ran Jin & Hao Wu & Xinwei Deng, 2020. "Multivariate regression of mixed responses for evaluation of visualization designs," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(3), pages 313-325, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:uiiexx:v:53:y:2020:i:3:p:313-325
    DOI: 10.1080/24725854.2020.1755068
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/24725854.2020.1755068
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/24725854.2020.1755068?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uiiexx:v:53:y:2020:i:3:p:313-325. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uiie .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.