IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uiiexx/v52y2020i6p603-616.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A study of the lock-free tour problem and path-based reformulations

Author

Listed:
  • Mehmet Başdere
  • Karen Smilowitz
  • Sanjay Mehrotra

Abstract

Motivated by marathon course design, this article introduces a novel tour-finding problem, the Lock-Free Tour Problem (LFTP), which ensures that the resulting tour does not block access to certain critical vertices. The LFTP is formulated as a mixed-integer linear program. Structurally, the LFTP yields excessive subtour formation, causing the standard branch-and-cut approach to perform poorly, even with valid inequalities derived from locking properties of the LFTP. For this reason, we introduce path-based reformulations arising from a provably stronger disjunctive program, where disjunctions are obtained by fixing the visit orders in which must-visit edges are visited. In computational tests, the reformulations are shown to yield up to 100 times improvement in solution times. Additional tests demonstrate the value of reformulations for more general tour-finding problems with visit requirements and length restrictions. Finally, practical insights from the Bank of America Chicago Marathon are presented. Supplementary materials are available for this article. We refer the reader to the publisher’s online edition for additional experiments.

Suggested Citation

  • Mehmet Başdere & Karen Smilowitz & Sanjay Mehrotra, 2020. "A study of the lock-free tour problem and path-based reformulations," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(6), pages 603-616, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:uiiexx:v:52:y:2020:i:6:p:603-616
    DOI: 10.1080/24725854.2019.1662141
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/24725854.2019.1662141
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/24725854.2019.1662141?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uiiexx:v:52:y:2020:i:6:p:603-616. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uiie .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.