IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uiiexx/v48y2016i5p462-474.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Compressive sensing–based optimal sensor placement and fault diagnosis for multi-station assembly processes

Author

Listed:
  • Kaveh Bastani
  • Zhenyu (James) Kong
  • Wenzhen Huang
  • Yingqing Zhou

Abstract

Developments in sensing technologies have created the opportunity to diagnose the process faults in multi-station assembly processes by analyzing measurement data. Sufficient diagnosability for process faults is a challenging issue, as the sensors cannot be excessively used. Therefore, there have been a number of methods reported in the literature for the optimization of the diagnosability of a diagnostic method for a given sensor cost, thus allowing the identification of process faults incurred in multi-station assembly processes. However, most of these methods assume that the number of sensors is more than that of the process errors. Unfortunately, this assumption may not hold in many real industrial applications. Thus, the diagnostic methods have to solve underdetermined linear equations. In order to address this issue, we propose an optimal sensor placement method by devising a new diagnosability criterion based on compressive sensing theory, which is able to handle underdetermined linear equations. Our method seeks the optimal sensor placement by minimizing the average mutual coherence to maximize the diagnosability. The proposed method is demonstrated and validated through case studies from actual industrial applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Kaveh Bastani & Zhenyu (James) Kong & Wenzhen Huang & Yingqing Zhou, 2016. "Compressive sensing–based optimal sensor placement and fault diagnosis for multi-station assembly processes," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(5), pages 462-474, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:uiiexx:v:48:y:2016:i:5:p:462-474
    DOI: 10.1080/0740817X.2015.1096431
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0740817X.2015.1096431
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0740817X.2015.1096431?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uiiexx:v:48:y:2016:i:5:p:462-474. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uiie .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.