IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uiiexx/v45y2013i6p630-643.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Objective-oriented optimal sensor allocation strategy for process monitoring and diagnosis by multivariate analysis in a Bayesian network

Author

Listed:
  • Kaibo Liu
  • Jianjun Shi

Abstract

Measurement strategy and sensor allocation have a direct impact on the product quality, productivity, and cost. This article studies the couplings or interactions between the optimal design of a sensor system and quality management in a manufacturing system, which can improve cost-effectiveness and production yield by considering sensor cost, process change detection speed, and fault diagnosis accuracy. Based on an established definition of sensor allocation in a Bayesian network, an algorithm named “Best Allocation Subsets by Intelligent Search” (BASIS) is developed in this article to obtain the optimal sensor allocation design at minimum cost under different specified Average Run Length (ARL) requirements. Unlike previous approaches reported in the literature, the BASIS algorithm is developed based on investigating a multivariate T2 control chart when only partial observations are available. After implementing the derived optimal sensor solution, a diagnosis ranking method is proposed to find the root cause variables by ranking all of the identified potential faults. Two case studies are conducted on a hot forming process and a cap alignment process to illustrate and evaluate the developed methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Kaibo Liu & Jianjun Shi, 2013. "Objective-oriented optimal sensor allocation strategy for process monitoring and diagnosis by multivariate analysis in a Bayesian network," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(6), pages 630-643.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:uiiexx:v:45:y:2013:i:6:p:630-643
    DOI: 10.1080/0740817X.2012.725505
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0740817X.2012.725505
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0740817X.2012.725505?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uiiexx:v:45:y:2013:i:6:p:630-643. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uiie .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.