IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ugtixx/v32y2017i1p44-58.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring differences in creativity across academic majors for high-ability college students

Author

Listed:
  • Angie L. Miller
  • Veronica A. Smith

Abstract

Many current theories and models include creativity as a component of giftedness, conceptualizing the construct in numerous ways that complement giftedness. Variations in creativity have also been studied among different academic disciplines, suggesting that although there may be higher levels of creativity for some, major choice is a complex concept. The current study explores differences in several aspects of creativity based on academic major for a high-ability young adult population. Using data from 399 Honors College students at a Midwestern university in the United States, a MANOVA and series of 1-way ANOVAs suggest significant differences by academic major for creative engagement, creative cognitive style, and fantasy, but not for tolerance or spontaneity. The pattern of results generally indicates higher creativity among arts and humanities majors, compared with other disciplines such as education and pre-professional training, although these fields can also benefit from creative input. Potential curricular and experiential reasons for these differences are discussed, along with some implications for educational programming and interventions.

Suggested Citation

  • Angie L. Miller & Veronica A. Smith, 2017. "Exploring differences in creativity across academic majors for high-ability college students," Gifted and Talented International, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(1), pages 44-58, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:ugtixx:v:32:y:2017:i:1:p:44-58
    DOI: 10.1080/15332276.2018.1435355
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/15332276.2018.1435355
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/15332276.2018.1435355?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ugtixx:v:32:y:2017:i:1:p:44-58. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ugti .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.