IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ugtixx/v30y2015i1-2p85-105.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Myth busting: Do high-performance students prefer working alone?

Author

Listed:
  • Cheryl L. Walker
  • Bruce M. Shore

Abstract

There has been a longstanding assumption that gifted, high-ability, or high-performing students prefer working alone; however, this may not be true in every case. The current study expanded on this assumption to reveal more nuanced learning preferences of these students. Sixty-nine high-performing and community-school students in Grades 5 and 6 participated. A 26-item questionnaire addressed students’ learning preferences. Nine students were interviewed after completing the questionnaire to further explore their answers. Substantial evidence supported high-performing students’ preferences for working with others. These preferences were complex and varied depending on the learning situation. Implications for future research were discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Cheryl L. Walker & Bruce M. Shore, 2015. "Myth busting: Do high-performance students prefer working alone?," Gifted and Talented International, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(1-2), pages 85-105, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:ugtixx:v:30:y:2015:i:1-2:p:85-105
    DOI: 10.1080/15332276.2015.1137461
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/15332276.2015.1137461
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/15332276.2015.1137461?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ugtixx:v:30:y:2015:i:1-2:p:85-105. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ugti .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.