IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ugtixx/v26y2011i1-2p25-30.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How does Moral Judgement Change with Age and Giftedness?

Author

Listed:
  • Mousa Alnabhan

Abstract

The current study aimed at identifying the differences in moral Judgment levels among female students according to their giftedness and grade levels. In specific, the study attempted to answer the following questions: (1) Does moral judgment differ due to the differences in giftedness and grade levels? (2) Is it possible to efficiently predict the moral judgment levels for female students through non verbal intelligence, creativity, and achievement?A sample of (232) female students has been randomly selected as of (115) from 11th grade and (117) from 8th grade. This was selected from ten schools of the capital district of Kuwait. The moral judgment test, Raven’s progressive Matrices, Torrance Tests for Creative Thinking (verbal form), and the student’s general average were utilized to answer the research questions.The results revealed that there are statistical significance differences in moral judgment according to the main effects of giftedness and grade level. And it is possible to predict the moral judgment through creativity only.

Suggested Citation

  • Mousa Alnabhan, 2011. "How does Moral Judgement Change with Age and Giftedness?," Gifted and Talented International, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1-2), pages 25-30, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:ugtixx:v:26:y:2011:i:1-2:p:25-30
    DOI: 10.1080/15332276.2011.11673586
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/15332276.2011.11673586
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/15332276.2011.11673586?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ugtixx:v:26:y:2011:i:1-2:p:25-30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ugti .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.