IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ugtixx/v26y2011i1-2p11-24.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Teachers’ Perceptions of the Socioemotional Development of Intellectually Gifted Primary Aged Students and Their Attitudes Towards Ability Grouping and Acceleration

Author

Listed:
  • Selena Gallagher
  • Susen R. Smith
  • Peter Merrotsy

Abstract

This qualitative multi-site case study sought to examine the current educational provisions in place for intellectually gifted primary school students in Queensland and to consider how the beliefs and attitudes of primary school stakeholders were reflected in the production of their school gifted education policies. Attitudes and perceptions of principals and teachers at four Queensland primary schools are reported in this article. The major findings indicated that while reported attitudes towards acceleration and ability grouping were fairly positive overall, educators are still concerned about the possible adverse effects of grade-skipping on students’ social and emotional development, and the connotations of elitism associated with full-time models of ability grouping. However, teachers’ knowledge and awareness of the affective characteristics of gifted students did not appear to influence their attitudes or beliefs regarding acceleration and ability grouping.

Suggested Citation

  • Selena Gallagher & Susen R. Smith & Peter Merrotsy, 2011. "Teachers’ Perceptions of the Socioemotional Development of Intellectually Gifted Primary Aged Students and Their Attitudes Towards Ability Grouping and Acceleration," Gifted and Talented International, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1-2), pages 11-24, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:ugtixx:v:26:y:2011:i:1-2:p:11-24
    DOI: 10.1080/15332276.2011.11673585
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/15332276.2011.11673585
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/15332276.2011.11673585?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ugtixx:v:26:y:2011:i:1-2:p:11-24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ugti .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.