IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ugitxx/v4y2001i1p27-44.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Empirical Evaluation of Organizational Media Use in Singapore

Author

Listed:
  • Laku Chidambaram
  • John Lim
  • Hock Chuan Chan
  • Kyung-U Han

Abstract

This paper reports on the organizational and individual determinants of media use in Singaporean organizations. While past research on media use has focused on matching a particular medium with a particular type of task, the current study proposes a "media coexistence" approach. This approach suggests that different media have, at the same time, both unique attributes (which allow them to exist as complements in a portfolio of choices) and similarities (which allow users to substitute one medium for another when needed). Data was collected using a survey from 151 respondents — comprised of managers and professionals — working in a variety of organizations located in Singapore. The results suggest that media use is multidimensional and not nearly as dichotomous as media richness theory suggests. For example, the same medium, telephones, can play a dual role depending on the circumstances: as a substitute for face-to-face communication and as a complement to other media such as e-mail or written communication. The media coexistence approach therefore provides a contingency view of media use wherein different media can, depending on individual and organizational factors, serve as substitutes for and complements of each other. Surprisingly, the results also highlight the predominance of traditional media in some organizational contexts, even in a high-tech city-state such as Singapore. The implications of these results for practice and research are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Laku Chidambaram & John Lim & Hock Chuan Chan & Kyung-U Han, 2001. "An Empirical Evaluation of Organizational Media Use in Singapore," Journal of Global Information Technology Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 27-44, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:ugitxx:v:4:y:2001:i:1:p:27-44
    DOI: 10.1080/1097198X.2001.10856294
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1097198X.2001.10856294
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1097198X.2001.10856294?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ugitxx:v:4:y:2001:i:1:p:27-44. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ugit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.