IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ugitxx/v20y2017i4p214-235.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Culture’s impact on trust, distrust, and intentions in data theft environments: A cross-cultural exploratory study

Author

Listed:
  • Steven “Doc” Simon
  • Carol Cagle

Abstract

Data breaches—security incidents—have become an everyday occurrence, with hundreds of millions of consumers having their lost personal identification information (PII), had their credit and debit card numbers stolen, and their credit compromised. Despite the risk, consumers continuously swipe their cards and share their personal information regularly. This study examines the impacts of trust and distrust on consumer intentions in data theft environments across five culturally distinct regions as defined by Hofstede’s dimensions. Five hundred and two (502) consumers involved in technology-driven transactions comprise the data sample. Trust, distrust, and intentions are investigated to determine (1) if trust and distrust are truly two distinct constructs, (2) if individuals from diverse cultures perceive trust and distrust differently, and (3) the impact on consumer intentions toward transactions. The study expands the literature treating trust and distrust as distinct yet inter-related constructs while introducing culture as a moderating variable. The findings demonstrate statistically significant differences across cultural clusters for trust, distrust, and intentions.

Suggested Citation

  • Steven “Doc” Simon & Carol Cagle, 2017. "Culture’s impact on trust, distrust, and intentions in data theft environments: A cross-cultural exploratory study," Journal of Global Information Technology Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(4), pages 214-235, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:ugitxx:v:20:y:2017:i:4:p:214-235
    DOI: 10.1080/1097198X.2017.1388672
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1097198X.2017.1388672
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1097198X.2017.1388672?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ugitxx:v:20:y:2017:i:4:p:214-235. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ugit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.