IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ucsbxx/v7y2026i3p684-706.html

Impact measurement for social enterprises: Social return on investment and subjective well-being valuation in the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Allison L. Ricket
  • Tim Goodspeed

Abstract

Effective impact measurement is critical for social enterprises seeking to allocate resources and funding toward products and services that advance social justice. Yet many small, underresourced, or early-stage organizations struggle to quantify their impact, especially when it comes to intangible outcomes like well-being. Unlike some countries, the United States lacks standardized tools to consistently value well-being, making it harder to capture the full scope of social impact. This study responds to that gap by introducing U.S.-specific well-being valuations using the Wellbeing-Adjusted Life Year (WELLBY) framework and nationally representative data. The results offer actionable guidance for practitioners, policy makers, and funders seeking to include subjective well-being in impact analysis, funding, and decision-making processes to bring U.S. practices closer in line with global standards. This is the first U.S. study to use WELLBY, equipping social enterprises with tools to incorporate intangible well-being outcomes into impact measurement and aligning U.S. practices with international standards.

Suggested Citation

  • Allison L. Ricket & Tim Goodspeed, 2026. "Impact measurement for social enterprises: Social return on investment and subjective well-being valuation in the United States," Journal of the International Council for Small Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(3), pages 684-706, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:ucsbxx:v:7:y:2026:i:3:p:684-706
    DOI: 10.1080/26437015.2025.2532775
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/26437015.2025.2532775
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/26437015.2025.2532775?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ucsbxx:v:7:y:2026:i:3:p:684-706. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ucsb .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.