Author
Listed:
- Edward Frees
- Robert Miller
Abstract
Actuaries, like other business professionals, communicate quantitative ideas graphically. Because the process of reading, or decoding, graphs is more complex than reading text, graphs are vulnerable to abuse. To underscore this vulnerability, we give several examples of commonly encountered graphs that mislead and hide information. To help creators design more effective graphs and to help viewers recognize misleading graphs, this article summarizes guidelines for designing graphs that show important numerical information. When designing graphs, creators should:(1) Avoid chartjunk(2) Use small multiples to promote comparisons and assess change(3) Use complex graphs to portray complex patterns(4) Relate graph size to information content(5) Use graphical forms that promote comparisons(6) Integrate graphs and text(7) Demonstrate an important message(8) Know the audience.Some of these guidelines for designing effective graphs, such as (6), (7) and (8), are drawn directly from principles for effective writing. Others, such as guidelines (3), (4) and (5), come from cognitive psychology, the science of perception. Guidelines (1) and (2) have roots both in effective writing and in graphical perception. For example, the writing principle of brevity demonstrates how eliminating pseudo three-dimensional perspectives and other forms of chartjunk improve graphs. As another example, the writing principle of parallel structure suggests using small multiple variations of a basic graphical form to visualize complex relationships across different groups and over time.To underscore the scientific aspect of graphical perception, we examine the process of communicating with a graph, beginning with a sender’s interpretation of data and ending with a receiver’s interpretation of the graph. In keeping with scientific tradition, this article discusses several studies in the literature on the effectiveness of graphs.We conclude that the actuarial profession has many opportunities to improve its practice, making communication more efficient and precise.
Suggested Citation
Edward Frees & Robert Miller, 1998.
"Designing Effective Graphs,"
North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(2), pages 53-70.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:uaajxx:v:2:y:1998:i:2:p:53-70
DOI: 10.1080/10920277.1998.10595699
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uaajxx:v:2:y:1998:i:2:p:53-70. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uaaj .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.