IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uaajxx/v29y2025i3p686-712.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multimarket Competition and Earnings Quality: Evidence from the Insurance Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Wenyi Cai
  • Yijia Lin
  • Biyu Wu
  • Jifeng Yu

Abstract

This study examines the impact of firm-specific competition on earnings quality, focusing on a large sample of property-casualty insurers in the United States. Our findings support the hypothesis based on multimarket competition theory, revealing an inverted U-shaped relationship between multimarket contact (MMC)—the degree of market overlap between firms—and earnings quality. Initially, as MMC increases, insurers report higher quality loss reserves. However, beyond a certain point, further increases in MMC lead to a decline in loss reserve quality. These findings suggest that while heightened multimarket competition enhances earnings quality, excessive MMC results in mutual forbearance, which deteriorates earnings quality. Quantile regression analyses indicate that this inverted U-shaped relationship is more pronounced among insurers with lower earnings quality. Additionally, our results are robust across various earnings quality measures, instrumental variable analyses, and subsample analyses. Overall, we provide initial evidence that MMC significantly influences financial reporting quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenyi Cai & Yijia Lin & Biyu Wu & Jifeng Yu, 2025. "Multimarket Competition and Earnings Quality: Evidence from the Insurance Industry," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(3), pages 686-712, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:uaajxx:v:29:y:2025:i:3:p:686-712
    DOI: 10.1080/10920277.2025.2488470
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10920277.2025.2488470
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10920277.2025.2488470?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uaajxx:v:29:y:2025:i:3:p:686-712. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uaaj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.