Author
Listed:
- Freek Holvoet
- Katrien Antonio
- Roel Henckaerts
Abstract
Insurers usually turn to generalized linear models for modeling claim frequency and severity data. Due to their success in other fields, machine learning techniques are gaining popularity within the actuarial toolbox. Our article contributes to the literature on frequency–severity insurance pricing with machine learning via deep learning structures. We present a benchmark study on four insurance datasets with frequency and severity targets in the presence of multiple types of input features. We compare in detail the performance of a generalized linear model on binned input data, a gradient-boosted tree model, a feed-forward neural network (FFNN), and the combined actuarial neural network (CANN). The CANNs combine a baseline prediction established with a generalized linear model (GLM) and gradient boosting model (GMB), respectively, with a neural network correction. We explain the data preprocessing steps with specific focus on the multiple types of input features typically present in tabular insurance datasets, such as postal codes and numeric and categorical covariates. Autoencoders are used to embed the categorical variables into the neural network, and we explore their potential advantages in a frequency–severity setting. Model performance is evaluated not only on out-of-sample deviance but also using statistical and calibration performance criteria and managerial tools to get more nuanced insights. Finally, we construct global surrogate models for the neural nets’ frequency and severity models. These surrogates enable the translation of the essential insights captured by the FFNNs or CANNs to GLMs. As such, a technical tariff table results that can easily be deployed in practice.
Suggested Citation
Freek Holvoet & Katrien Antonio & Roel Henckaerts, 2025.
"Neural Networks for Insurance Pricing with Frequency and Severity Data: A Benchmark Study from Data Preprocessing to Technical Tariff,"
North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(3), pages 519-562, July.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:uaajxx:v:29:y:2025:i:3:p:519-562
DOI: 10.1080/10920277.2025.2451860
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uaajxx:v:29:y:2025:i:3:p:519-562. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uaaj .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.