IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uaajxx/v24y2020i4p626-646.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reducing Medical Malpractice Loss Reserve Volatility Through Tort Reform

Author

Listed:
  • Patricia H. Born
  • Evan M. Eastman
  • W. Kip Viscusi

Abstract

This study examines how tort reform affects uncertainty in insurance markets by testing whether noneconomic damage caps influence reserving volatility for medical malpractice insurers. Using a panel of insurers from 1986 to 2009, we estimate the determinants of loss reserve error volatility and focus on how this volatility is influenced by the percent of premiums an insurer writes that are subject to noneconomic damage caps. We find empirical evidence that tort reform reduces reserve volatility over the subsequent 3- and 5-year periods, consistent with tort reform improving insurers’ loss forecasting ability. Our findings address outcomes of tort reform that are prominent concerns of legislators, regulators, and policyholders. This article contributes both to the literature examining the insurance market effects of tort reform and to the literature examining loss reserving practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Patricia H. Born & Evan M. Eastman & W. Kip Viscusi, 2020. "Reducing Medical Malpractice Loss Reserve Volatility Through Tort Reform," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(4), pages 626-646, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:uaajxx:v:24:y:2020:i:4:p:626-646
    DOI: 10.1080/10920277.2020.1733616
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10920277.2020.1733616
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10920277.2020.1733616?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uaajxx:v:24:y:2020:i:4:p:626-646. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uaaj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.