IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tsysxx/v45y2014i10p2127-2132.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Oil supply between OPEC and non-OPEC based on game theory

Author

Listed:
  • Yuwen Chang
  • Jiexin Yi
  • Wei Yan
  • Xinshe Yang
  • Song Zhang
  • Yifan Gao
  • Xi Wang

Abstract

The competing strategies between OPEC (Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries) and non-OPEC producers make the oil supply market a complex system, and thus, it is very difficult to model and to make predictions. In this paper, we combine the macro-model based on game theory and micro-model to propose a new approach for forecasting oil supply. We take into account the microscopic behaviour in the clearing market and also use the game relationships to adjust oil supplies in our approach. For the supply model, we analyse and consider the different behaviour of non-OPEC and OPEC producers. According to our analysis, limiting the oil supply, and thus maintaining oil price, is the best strategy for OPEC in the low-price scenario, while the rising supply is the best strategy in the high-price scenario. No matter what the oil price is, the dominant strategy for non-OPEC producers is to increase their oil supply. In the high-price scenario, OPEC will try to deplete non-OPEC’s share in the oil supply market, which is to OPEC’s advantage.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuwen Chang & Jiexin Yi & Wei Yan & Xinshe Yang & Song Zhang & Yifan Gao & Xi Wang, 2014. "Oil supply between OPEC and non-OPEC based on game theory," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(10), pages 2127-2132, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tsysxx:v:45:y:2014:i:10:p:2127-2132
    DOI: 10.1080/00207721.2012.762562
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00207721.2012.762562
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00207721.2012.762562?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tsysxx:v:45:y:2014:i:10:p:2127-2132. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TSYS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.