IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tstfxx/v1y2017i2p182-184.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Personalised medicine with multiple treatments: a PhD thesis abstract

Author

Listed:
  • Zhilan Lou

Abstract

When there is substantial heterogeneity of treatment effectiveness for comparative treatment selection, it is crucial to identify individualised treatment rules for patients who have heterogeneous responses to treatment. Existing approaches include directly modelling clinical outcome by defining the optimal treatment rule according to the interactions between treatment and covariates and outcome weighted approach that uses clinical outcome as weights to maximise a target function whose value directly reflects correct treatment assignment. All existing articles of estimating individualised treatment rules are all assuming just two treatment assignments. Here we propose an outcome weighted learning approach that uses a vector hinge loss to extend estimating individualised treatment rules in multi-category treatments case. The consistency of the resulting estimator is shown. We also demonstrate the performance of our approach in simulation studies and a real data analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhilan Lou, 2017. "Personalised medicine with multiple treatments: a PhD thesis abstract," Statistical Theory and Related Fields, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(2), pages 182-184, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tstfxx:v:1:y:2017:i:2:p:182-184
    DOI: 10.1080/24754269.2017.1396426
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/24754269.2017.1396426
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/24754269.2017.1396426?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tstfxx:v:1:y:2017:i:2:p:182-184. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tstf .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.