IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tstfxx/v1y2017i1p37-47.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Personalised treatment assignment maximising expected benefit with smooth hinge loss

Author

Listed:
  • Shixue Liu
  • Jun Shao
  • Menggang Yu

Abstract

In personalised medicine, the goal is to make a treatment recommendation for each patient with a given set of covariates to maximise the treatment benefit measured by patient's response to the treatment. In application, such a treatment assignment rule is constructed using a sample training data consisting of patients’ responses and covariates. Instead of modelling responses using treatments and covariates, an alternative approach is maximising a response-weighted target function whose value directly reflects the effectiveness of treatment assignments. Since the target function involves a loss function, efforts have been made recently on the choice of the loss function to ensure a computationally feasible and theoretically sound solution. We propose to use a smooth hinge loss function so that the target function is convex and differentiable, which possesses good asymptotic properties and numerical advantages. To further simplify the computation and interpretability, we focus on the rules that are linear functions of covariates and discuss their asymptotic properties. We also examine the performances of our method with simulation studies and real data analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Shixue Liu & Jun Shao & Menggang Yu, 2017. "Personalised treatment assignment maximising expected benefit with smooth hinge loss," Statistical Theory and Related Fields, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(1), pages 37-47, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tstfxx:v:1:y:2017:i:1:p:37-47
    DOI: 10.1080/24754269.2017.1326080
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/24754269.2017.1326080
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/24754269.2017.1326080?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tstfxx:v:1:y:2017:i:1:p:37-47. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tstf .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.