IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/transr/v46y2026i2p248-269.html

Does economic regulation improve efficiency? The case of airports

Author

Listed:
  • Nicole Adler
  • Hans-Martin Niemeier
  • Shravan Kumar

Abstract

Over the past 30 years, regulatory reforms have been introduced to enhance airport efficiency compared to traditional rate-of-return regulation. But have these reforms succeeded? We survey research on the impact of airport regulatory frameworks on technical, cost and allocative efficiency, addressing methodological challenges and identifying gaps for future study. We find that approaches such as total factor productivity, stochastic frontier analysis and data envelopment analysis are useful for assessing the effects of regulation, but many studies miss salient inputs and outputs, particularly in measuring capital. In second stage analyses, governance related variables, such as ownership structure, competition and regulatory design, are often overlooked. Most studies conclude that regulation improves airport efficiency, with dual-till price-caps and light-handed regulation being the more effective. However, light-handed regulation fails to reduce aeronautical charges and there is no consensus on which regulatory model achieves lower charges. Finally, allocative efficiency through peak pricing and slot trading remains unexplored.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicole Adler & Hans-Martin Niemeier & Shravan Kumar, 2026. "Does economic regulation improve efficiency? The case of airports," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(2), pages 248-269, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:transr:v:46:y:2026:i:2:p:248-269
    DOI: 10.1080/01441647.2025.2572516
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01441647.2025.2572516
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01441647.2025.2572516?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:transr:v:46:y:2026:i:2:p:248-269. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TTRV20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.