IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/transr/v46y2026i1p52-76.html

Understanding the e-scooter user puzzle: a systematic literature review

Author

Listed:
  • Roxani Gkavra
  • Yusak O. Susilo

Abstract

Research on e-scooter sharing has increased rapidly over the last six years. The present paper provides an in-depth review of the scholarly literature on the characteristics of e-scooter-sharing users. The present review is the first one dedicated to the e-scooter (potential) user profile. The review covers geographically spread studies which examined e-scooter users in the early (pilot) operation periods, during the Covid-19 pandemic, and after the maturity of the e-scooter sharing schemes. Following the PRISMA method, the systematic literature search ended with seventy-five empirical scientific publications. The review contributions include mapping the determinants of e-scooter sharing current and stated usage, completing the dominant user characteristics puzzle, and designing a conceptual framework for the e-scooter user profile. The framework was built upon revealed statistically significant main interaction effects of four variable categories: sociodemographic, mobility, household characteristics, and attitudes. The proposed framework can assist and guide researchers and system stakeholders in the variable and effect testing selection process of identifying users’ profiles. The review also uncovers research gaps regarding not only the characteristics and their relationship types investigated in the existing literature but also the study data, methods and context. Concluding upon the knowledge status quo and the limitations of past research, the review proposes future research paths which could lead to more systematic, generalisable, and holistic knowledge of e-scooter sharing (potential) user groups.

Suggested Citation

  • Roxani Gkavra & Yusak O. Susilo, 2026. "Understanding the e-scooter user puzzle: a systematic literature review," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(1), pages 52-76, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:transr:v:46:y:2026:i:1:p:52-76
    DOI: 10.1080/01441647.2025.2545221
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01441647.2025.2545221
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01441647.2025.2545221?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:transr:v:46:y:2026:i:1:p:52-76. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TTRV20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.