IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/transr/v45y2025i6p1048-1084.html

Commuters’ perception of safety in public transport: a review of approaches, gaps and emerging research opportunities

Author

Listed:
  • Apoorv Agrawal
  • Francesco Pilla
  • Anna Mölter

Abstract

Commuter priorities in public transport have shifted from mere service availability and cost–benefit considerations to include perception of safety, which has become a key determinant of ridership and overall satisfaction. This review critically examines how commuters’ safety perceptions are studied in public transport and evaluates current methodological approaches, including the use and potential of novel data sources and machine learning (ML) techniques. A systematic review of 54 studies reveals three key research gaps. First, existing studies rely on conventional mapping and analysis methods, with limited use of novel data sources and ML techniques in geospatial analysis. This restricts the ability to capture non-linear relationships, uncover latent variables, and integrate multimodal data relevant to safety perception. Second, studies often overlook a comprehensive analysis of physical and environmental factors, despite the literature consistently identifying them as critical impacts on commuters’ safety perceptions, thus limiting the understanding of the role of the built environment. Third, reliance on traditional approaches for adopting theoretical frameworks restricts methodological innovation and limits the diversity of contexts addressed, reducing the scalability of existing studies. While ML techniques have demonstrated value in multiple urban studies, their potential remains underutilised in public transport safety research. Addressing these gaps through theory-driven, data-integrated approaches is vital to advancing a more inclusive and responsive public transport environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Apoorv Agrawal & Francesco Pilla & Anna Mölter, 2025. "Commuters’ perception of safety in public transport: a review of approaches, gaps and emerging research opportunities," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(6), pages 1048-1084, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:transr:v:45:y:2025:i:6:p:1048-1084
    DOI: 10.1080/01441647.2025.2538077
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01441647.2025.2538077
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01441647.2025.2538077?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:transr:v:45:y:2025:i:6:p:1048-1084. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TTRV20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.