IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/transr/v45y2025i5p672-695.html

How to make service better? A review on developing service-oriented public transit systems

Author

Listed:
  • Xinyu Liu
  • Jan-Dirk Schmöcker
  • Jing Zhao
  • Xiaoguang Yang

Abstract

Improving service quality of urban public transportation systems is essential for attracting travellers. Ideally, building a service-oriented transit system requires holistic approaches on the closed cycle of measuring travellers’ perception of transit service, relating perceptions with supply factors, and making optimisation or improvement decisions with the goal of better service and lower cost. Separate literature reviews on transit service quality measurement and transit system optimisation were conducted previously, while there is no review investigating the consistency of service quality perceptions and optimisation approaches in an integrated manner. To fill this gap, we systematically reviewed existing contributions and examined the connections among transit service quality measurement, influence of supply factors on service quality and transit system optimisation. Results revealed gaps on goals of subjective passenger perceptions in existing optimisation methods as well as the need for embedding interplays between perceived service quality indicators and supply factors. Our research findings provide directions to future studies in this field, and we posit the importance of integrating human factors considerations in transit policy, planning and operation practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Xinyu Liu & Jan-Dirk Schmöcker & Jing Zhao & Xiaoguang Yang, 2025. "How to make service better? A review on developing service-oriented public transit systems," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(5), pages 672-695, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:transr:v:45:y:2025:i:5:p:672-695
    DOI: 10.1080/01441647.2025.2502629
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01441647.2025.2502629
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01441647.2025.2502629?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:transr:v:45:y:2025:i:5:p:672-695. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TTRV20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.