IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/transp/v49y2026i5p839-856.html

Public perception of autonomous delivery robots inside cities: a case-study conducted in Gothenburg, Sweden

Author

Listed:
  • Valeska Engesser
  • Fredrick Ekman
  • Philippe Lebeau

Abstract

The integration of robots into daily life is becoming increasingly common, with Autonomous Delivery Robots (ADR) gaining prominence as an eco-friendly delivery option. Understanding how individuals perceive ADR when encountered unintentionally is crucial, especially given the important role the public has concerning sharing public space which form the research objective of this study. Study outcome becomes relevant during planning and integration of ADR, facilitating seamless operation. Employing a mixed-method approach, including questionnaires and interviews, the analysis identified four themes related to pre-conception, attitude, robot design and behaviour, and traffic system integration. Study results highlight the perceived usefulness and generally accepting attitude toward the idea of ADR. While the majority of the public perceives sharing space with ADR positive, special attention is needed concerning the area of operation and considering the factors speed and size. Different perceptions of the ADR behaviour could be noted with the ADR adapting to participants being considered a necessity.

Suggested Citation

  • Valeska Engesser & Fredrick Ekman & Philippe Lebeau, 2026. "Public perception of autonomous delivery robots inside cities: a case-study conducted in Gothenburg, Sweden," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(5), pages 839-856, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:transp:v:49:y:2026:i:5:p:839-856
    DOI: 10.1080/03081060.2025.2485380
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03081060.2025.2485380
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03081060.2025.2485380?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:transp:v:49:y:2026:i:5:p:839-856. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/GTPT20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.