IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/transp/v48y2025i8p1607-1634.html

A comparative analysis of optimal high-speed railway station locations: downtown versus suburbs

Author

Listed:
  • Zhongzhen Yang
  • Erzhuo Zhang
  • Feng Lian

Abstract

This study aims to resolve the high-speed railway (HSR) station location dilemma, balancing central urban convenience and suburban urbanization promotion, to maximize the gap between a city’s Gross Domestic Product and the costs associated with station location. Two critical accessibilities are introduced: intra-city and inter-city. A Cobb–Douglas production function is constructed using the two accessibilities and the city’s built-up size to analyze the impact of HSR station location on urban land use. Additionally, the location associated costs were estimated. The Lowry model was adopted to examine employees’ decisions regarding their work and residential locations and the corresponding costs incurred. A case study of Jinhua demonstrated that the optimal HSR station location falls within intermediate zones where the level of urbanization closely resembles that of the downtown area. The findings indicate that locating HSR stations in intermediate zones can balance urbanization and accessibility, optimize land use, and minimize the associated costs.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhongzhen Yang & Erzhuo Zhang & Feng Lian, 2025. "A comparative analysis of optimal high-speed railway station locations: downtown versus suburbs," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(8), pages 1607-1634, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:transp:v:48:y:2025:i:8:p:1607-1634
    DOI: 10.1080/03081060.2024.2412282
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03081060.2024.2412282
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03081060.2024.2412282?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:transp:v:48:y:2025:i:8:p:1607-1634. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/GTPT20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.