IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/transp/v48y2025i5p807-825.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Aggression of electric bike riders in China: comparisons of the Cycling Anger Expression Inventory toward drivers, pedestrians, and other riders

Author

Listed:
  • Yueying Huo
  • Chenhao Wang
  • Jianrong Liu

Abstract

Electric bikes (e-bikes) account for an unexpected proportion of traffic crash injuries and deaths in China. There is an urgent need to study the factors influencing the aggressive behaviours of e-bike riders and reduce their potential involvement in crashes. In addition, aggression varies when directed at different types of road users, particularly when expressed by vulnerable groups. This study aimed to validate the Cycling Anger Expression Inventory (CAX) for e-bikers and explore whether the expression of aggression in e-bikers differs depending on the recipients, such as drivers, pedestrians, or other riders. The analysis examined the aggression specificity of e-bikers by employing tests of measurement invariance (MI). These findings indicate that adaptive/constructive expression has emerged as a mainstream strategy for managing e-biker anger. E-bikers exhibited the highest levels of aggression toward drivers. These results provide a strong basis for the prevention and intervention of aggression and accidents among Chinese e-bikers.

Suggested Citation

  • Yueying Huo & Chenhao Wang & Jianrong Liu, 2025. "Aggression of electric bike riders in China: comparisons of the Cycling Anger Expression Inventory toward drivers, pedestrians, and other riders," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(5), pages 807-825, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:transp:v:48:y:2025:i:5:p:807-825
    DOI: 10.1080/03081060.2024.2386327
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03081060.2024.2386327
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03081060.2024.2386327?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:transp:v:48:y:2025:i:5:p:807-825. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/GTPT20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.