IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/transp/v46y2023i7p888-911.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrating built environment and parking policy for car commuting reduction: evidence from Beijing

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoquan Wang
  • Chaoying Yin
  • Changjiang Zheng
  • Yang Shen
  • Chunfu Shao

Abstract

Built environment (BE) planning and parking policy are two major strategies for restricting car use. However, researchers usually explore the independent associations of BE and parking policy with the use of the car in commuting, and most earlier studies are limited to investigating the benefits of integrating them. This study adopts a machine learning approach to explore the associations of home and workplace BE features and parking policy with the use of the car in commuting and whether the associations of BE features are moderated by parking policy. Results suggest that workplace BE features have larger collective contributions to the use of the car in commuting than home BE features. All BE features have nonlinear associations with the use of the car in commuting, and the nonlinear patterns differ across home and workplace neighborhoods. Moreover, free parking and parking convenience have significant moderating effects on the connection between BE and the use of the car in commuting. Thus, planning practitioners and policy makers should highlight the importance of coordinating BE planning and policy making to restrict the use of the car in commuting.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoquan Wang & Chaoying Yin & Changjiang Zheng & Yang Shen & Chunfu Shao, 2023. "Integrating built environment and parking policy for car commuting reduction: evidence from Beijing," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(7), pages 888-911, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:transp:v:46:y:2023:i:7:p:888-911
    DOI: 10.1080/03081060.2023.2239236
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03081060.2023.2239236
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03081060.2023.2239236?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:transp:v:46:y:2023:i:7:p:888-911. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/GTPT20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.