IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/transp/v46y2023i3p359-379.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the use of common random numbers in activity-based travel demand modeling for scenario comparison

Author

Listed:
  • H. Zhou
  • J. L. Dorsman
  • M. Mandjes
  • M. Snelder

Abstract

Activity-based travel demand models provide a high level of detail when modeling complex travel behavior. Since stochastic simulation is used, however, this high level may induce large random fluctuations in the output, necessitating many model reruns to produce reliable output. This may become prohibitive in terms of computation time when comparing travel behavior between multiple scenarios, in which case each scenario requires its own simulation. To alleviate this issue, we study the use of common random numbers, which is a technique that reuses the same random numbers for choices made by travelers between scenarios. This ensures that any observed difference in output across scenarios cannot be attributed to mutual differences in drawn random numbers, eliminating an important source of random fluctuation. We demonstrate by a numerical study that common random numbers can greatly reduce the number of runs needed, and thus also the required computation time, to obtain reliable output.

Suggested Citation

  • H. Zhou & J. L. Dorsman & M. Mandjes & M. Snelder, 2023. "On the use of common random numbers in activity-based travel demand modeling for scenario comparison," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(3), pages 359-379, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:transp:v:46:y:2023:i:3:p:359-379
    DOI: 10.1080/03081060.2023.2182784
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03081060.2023.2182784
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03081060.2023.2182784?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:transp:v:46:y:2023:i:3:p:359-379. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/GTPT20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.