IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/transp/v44y2021i3p319-336.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparison of optimized deliveries by drone and truck

Author

Listed:
  • Youngmin Choi
  • Paul M. Schonfeld

Abstract

This paper formulates and compares four alternatives of package delivery service with and without the aid of drones: (i) conventional truck, (ii) drone supported by truck, (iii) one-to-one delivery by drone, and (iv) one-to-many delivery by drone. Each delivery alternative is optimized numerically with an objective of total cost minimization (i.e. the sum of user’s and operator’s costs). For analyzing the delivery systems, the authors employ their recently developed distance approximation methods that estimate average tour lengths when only a few points are visited points, due to limited drone loading capacity. Analyses are conducted with respect to sensitivity to driver pay rate, demand density, user value of waiting time for delivery, drone operating speed, service area size, drone size, and distribution hub location. For reasonable baseline inputs, results indicate that using drones for package deliveries may be cost-effective compared to using conventional trucks.

Suggested Citation

  • Youngmin Choi & Paul M. Schonfeld, 2021. "A comparison of optimized deliveries by drone and truck," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(3), pages 319-336, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:transp:v:44:y:2021:i:3:p:319-336
    DOI: 10.1080/03081060.2021.1883230
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03081060.2021.1883230
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03081060.2021.1883230?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:transp:v:44:y:2021:i:3:p:319-336. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/GTPT20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.