IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/transp/v44y2021i2p160-175.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating car-sharing switching rates from traditional transport means through logit models and Random Forest classifiers

Author

Listed:
  • Riccardo Ceccato
  • Andrea Chicco
  • Marco Diana

Abstract

Positive impacts of car-sharing, such as reductions in car ownership, congestion, vehicle-miles-traveled and greenhouse gas emissions, have been extensively analyzed. However, these benefits are not fully effective if car-sharing subtracts travel demand from existing sustainable modes. This paper evaluates substitution rates of car-sharing against private cars and public transport using a Random Forest classifier and Binomial Logit model. The models were calibrated and validated using a stated-preference travel survey and applied to a revealed-preference survey, both administered to a representative sample of the population living in Turin (Italy). Results of the two models show that the predictive power of both models is comparable, albeit the Logit model tends to estimate predictions with a higher reliability and the Random Forest model produces higher positive switches towards car-sharing. However, results from both models suggest that the substitution rate of private cars is, on average, almost five times that of public transport.

Suggested Citation

  • Riccardo Ceccato & Andrea Chicco & Marco Diana, 2021. "Evaluating car-sharing switching rates from traditional transport means through logit models and Random Forest classifiers," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(2), pages 160-175, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:transp:v:44:y:2021:i:2:p:160-175
    DOI: 10.1080/03081060.2020.1868084
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03081060.2020.1868084
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03081060.2020.1868084?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. MarĂ­a Vega-Gonzalo & Panayotis Christidis, 2022. "Fair Models for Impartial Policies: Controlling Algorithmic Bias in Transport Behavioural Modelling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-23, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:transp:v:44:y:2021:i:2:p:160-175. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/GTPT20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.